Local Church Movement, Lord's Recovery Movement,
or The Move of God? 
The terms “local
church movement” and “Lord’s recovery movement” have been used in
several places as negative descriptions of the local churches and
the Lord’s recovery. The meaning and significance of
local churches (or the
local church) and the
Lord’s recovery have been adequately covered elsewhere. In
brief, a local church is the expression of the universal church in
a particular locality. In reality, there is only one church and in
any place, all the believers in that place are members of the one
church. All believers recognize the oneness of the universal
church. But in recent history, many denominations, many divisions,
have been established. Today many Christians accept divisions as
normal. They even treasure the things that make one group different
and distinct from another. According to the Bible, from the
beginning of the church, there were no such divisions. In fact, the
formation of sects and parties was condemned; (1 Corinthians 3:3-5,
11:18). The Bible reveals local churches. Christians
meeting in oneness according to geographical location is the
recovery of a great truth in the Bible, not a “movement.”
“Through the course of church history certain matters have been lost,
misused, or corrupted and … God is restoring them to their original state or
condition. Simply put, in the eyes of God, recovery means to bring something
back to its original condition.
Martin Luther,
Count Zinzendorf,
John Nelson Darby,
Watchman Nee,
Witness Lee, and the
local churches have all been
instrumental in this recovery work of God through the centuries”
(http://www.lordsrecovery.org/).
The truths concerning God, Christ, the Spirit, the church, the Body of Christ,
the kingdom of God, and the New Jerusalem all have become lost or distorted
through the centuries of church history. The genuine experience of Christ and
the practice of the church life have been damaged. Beginning from the time of
Martin Luther, the Lord began to recover the truths that were kept in darkness
and to bring His people out of dead ritual and back to the genuine experience of
Him. This is the Lord’s recovery, not a “movement.”
The addition of the derisive term “movement,” that is, to
call this a “local church movement” and “Lord’s recovery movement,” signifies that
the accusers consider this to be something not of God but of man. Implicitly, the term
“movement” reduces the activities of those gathered under these banners to be,
at best, natural and, at worst, fleshy or fleshly, of Satan and not of God. By
adding the term “movement” to local churches the accusers imply that these are
not the genuine expression of the church, the Body of Christ. They imply that
these are even worse than the divisions in Christianity today, that these are
exclusive or even cultic. They further deny the Lord’s move in His recovery and
imply that it is not the Lord doing something for His purpose according to His
heart’s desire but, rather, subtle, selfish men stirring up others to make a
show and to make a profit.
Witness Lee had a clear
understanding of the difference between a work of the Lord and a “local church
movement” or a “Lord’s recovery movement” and he taught accordingly. It is clear
in reading his writings that there is no hint of selfish ambition, of something
natural, or of something for his own profit. He taught and he worked with a
clear view regarding the difference between the Lord’s work and a movement. His
understanding and view in this regard is demonstrated in the book: “Messages in
Preparation for The Spread of the Gospel.”

|